Guide to Carbon Credits Accounting: Recording, Valuing, and Reporting Offsets

The race to “Net Zero” is no longer just a PR slogan; it’s a strategic business imperative. As companies scramble to meet ambitious sustainability goals, the Voluntary Carbon Market (VCM) has exploded in value. Businesses are buying millions of dollars worth of carbon offsets—investments in projects that reduce or remove greenhouse gases elsewhere—to compensate for their own emissions.

But here is where the rubber meets the road for finance teams: When your company spends $5 million on reforestation credits in Brazil, what happens to that money on the books?

Is it an immediate expense? Is it an investment? Is it inventory?

If you are scratching your head, you are not alone. Carbon credits accounting is currently one of the grayest areas in financial reporting. The standard-setters (IASB and FASB) have lagged behind the market’s rapid evolution, leaving CFOs and controllers to navigate a maze of interpretations.

This guide is designed to cut through the confusion. We will move beyond the theoretical and look at practical ways to record, value, and report carbon offsets on the balance sheet, ensuring your financial statements are as robust as your sustainability promises.

The Core Problem: What Exactly IS a Carbon Credit Financially?

Before we can account for something, we have to define what it is.

In the real world, a carbon credit represents one metric ton of CO2 equivalent that has been reduced or removed from the atmosphere. It’s a certificate proving environmental benefit.

In the accounting world, however, its identity crisis is the root of all confusion.

To determine how to treat a credit, you must first determine why your company bought it. The intent dictates the accounting treatment. Generally, companies acquire carbon credits for one of three reasons:

1. For Immediate Retirement: You buy them to immediately offset current year emissions and claim “carbon neutrality” for that period.
2. For Future Use (Banking): You buy them now (perhaps at a lower price) to hold and retire against future emissions targets (e.g., a 2030 goal).
3. For Trading/Resale: You are acting as a broker or trader, buying low and intending to sell high for profit.

The accounting treatment for scenario #3 is relatively straightforward (it’s usually inventory). The real challenge—and the focus of this article—lies in scenarios #1 and #2: buying credits for your own use.

The Great Debate: Inventory vs. Intangible Asset

Since there isn’t one specific standard labeled “Carbon Offset Accounting,” accountants have to look at existing standards and apply the one that fits best by analogy.

Currently, the consensus among the “Big Four” accounting firms and major standard-setters leans toward two main classifications for credits held for own-use:

1. The Intangible Asset Argument (Most Common)

An intangible asset is an identifiable, non-monetary asset without physical substance.

Does a carbon credit fit this? Yes.

• It lacks physical substance (it’s a digital certificate).
• It is identifiable (it has unique serial numbers).
• It provides future economic benefits (by allowing the company to meet regulatory requirements or voluntary commitments, avoiding reputational damage or fines).

Under both International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) – specifically IAS 38 – and US GAAP (ASC 350), classifying carbon credits held for long-term use as intangible assets is often viewed as the most appropriate approach.

2. The Inventory Argument (Less Common for Own-Use)

Inventory is generally defined as an asset held for sale in the ordinary course of business, or materials to be consumed in the production process.

While some argue that carbon credits are “consumed” in the process of generating revenue (by offsetting the emissions caused by production), this is a stretch for most non-heavy-industry companies. If you aren’t in the business of selling credits, classifying them as inventory usually doesn’t fit the economic reality.

The Verdict: For most corporates buying offsets to meet sustainability goals, the Intangible Asset model is currently the safest and most widely accepted bet.

Step-by-Step Guide: How to Record Carbon Offsets

Let’s get practical. How do these transactions look in your general ledger? We will use the intangible asset model for these examples.

Scenario: Your company, Acme Corp, purchases 10,000 carbon credits for $20 each ($200,000 total) on January 1st.

Scenario A: Purchasing for Future Use (Capitalization)

If Acme Corp intends to hold these credits to offset emissions likely to occur in two years, the purchase should be capitalized on the balance sheet.

Journal Entry at Purchase Date:

Account	Debit	Credit
Dr. Intangible Assets – Carbon Credits	$200,000
Cr. Cash / Accounts Payable		$200,000
To record the purchase of carbon credits held for future use.

Scenario B: Purchasing for Immediate Retirement (Expensing)

Sometimes, a company buys credits at the end of the year specifically to cover that year’s emissions footprint and immediately “retires” them (cancels them in the registry so they cannot be used again).

If the time between purchase and retirement is negligible, many companies choose a policy of immediate expensing for simplicity.

Journal Entry at Purchase/Retirement Date:

Account	Debit	Credit
Dr. Carbon Offset Expense (P&L)	$200,000
Cr. Cash / Accounts Payable		$200,000
To record the purchase and immediate retirement of carbon credits.

Note: Even if you capitalize the asset initially (Scenario A), when you eventually “use” the credit to offset emissions, you must move it from the Balance Sheet to the P&L. This is done via amortization or derecognition upon retirement.

Journal Entry at Retirement (Following Scenario A):

Account	Debit	Credit
Dr. Carbon Offset Expense (P&L)	$200,000
Cr. Intangible Assets – Carbon Credits		$200,000
To recognize expense upon retirement of credits.

How to Value Carbon Credits on the Balance Sheet

You have recorded the credits on the balance sheet. Now, the tricky part: what are they worth a year later?

The Voluntary Carbon Market is notoriously volatile. The price of a specific type of nature-based credit could swing wildly based on market demand, verification standards, or even geopolitical events in the host country.

How you handle this volatility depends on the accounting standard you follow.

Valuation Under IFRS (IAS 38)

If you treat the credits as intangible assets under IFRS, you generally have two models for subsequent measurement:

1. The Cost Model (Most Common)

The asset is carried at its initial cost less any accumulated amortization and any accumulated impairment losses.

• Amortization: Since carbon credits usually have an indefinite useful life until they are retired, they are typically not amortized systematically.
• Impairment Testing: This is crucial. You must test the asset for impairment annually (or whenever there is an indicator that the value has dropped). If the market price for your specific type of credit crashes permanently below what you paid for it, you must write down the value on the balance sheet and take a loss on the P&L.

2. The Revaluation Model (Rarely Used)

This model allows you to carry the asset at its fair value at the revaluation date. If the market price goes up, you increase the asset value on the balance sheet.

Why is this rare? IAS 38 requires that fair value be determined by reference to an “active market.” Given the fragmentation and lack of transparency in many segments of the VCM, proving an “active market” exists for your specific batch of vintage credits is incredibly difficult. Furthermore, gains usually go to Other Comprehensive Income (OCI), while losses hit the P&L, creating asymmetrical volatility.

Valuation Under US GAAP (ASC 350)

US GAAP is stricter. It generally does not permit the revaluation model for intangible assets.

Under GAAP, you would typically use the Cost Model. You record the credits at cost. You do not amortize them if they have indefinite lives (held until retirement). You must test them regularly for impairment.

Crucial takeaway for valuation: Under both major standards, if you are holding credits for your own use, you will likely only recognize downward price movements (impairments) on your financial statements, never upward movements, until the credits are sold or retired.

Reporting: Presentation on the Balance Sheet

Where do these assets actually sit on the face of the balance sheet?

Because carbon credits are rarely material enough to warrant their own line item on a high-level balance sheet, they are usually aggregated into broader categories.

If you are classifying them as intangibles, they typically reside in:

• Intangible Assets, Net
• or, sometimes, Other Non-Current Assets (if held for long-term use).

If you are classifying them as inventory (for traders), they belong in Inventory.

The Vital Importance of Disclosures

Because the “face” of the balance sheet hides the details, the footnotes are where the real story must be told.

In the absence of explicit guidance, transparency is your best defense against regulator scrutiny and investor skepticism. Your disclosures should clearly state:

1. Accounting Policy: How do you classify credits (intangible vs. inventory) and why? What is your measurement basis (cost vs. revaluation)?
2. Holdings: The volume and type of credits held at period-end.
3. Impairment: Any impairment losses recognized during the period.
4. Retirement: The cost of credits retired during the period and recognized as an expense.
5. Commitments: Forward purchase agreements for future credits (which may need to be disclosed as contingent liabilities or commitments).

Pending Changes and the Future Outlook

The accounting world knows the current situation is unsustainable. The lack of standardized rules leads to incomparability between companies.

The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) has added a project on pollutant pricing mechanisms to its pipeline. The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) in the US is also under pressure to address this, especially with the SEC’s growing focus on climate disclosures.

While we wait for definitive rules, the best approach is a conservative one:

• Document your intent clearly.
• Apply existing standards (like intangible assets) consistently.
• Over-disclose in the footnotes to ensure users of the financial statements understand your approach.

Carbon credits accounting is complex, but by focusing on the economic substance of the transaction—why you bought them and how you will use them—you can navigate the gray areas and ensure your balance sheet reflects reality.

FAQs